Revista CEFAC
https://www.revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/1982-0216201517611415
Revista CEFAC
Original Articles

Olfactory acuity and quality of life after total laryngectomy

Acuidade olfatória e qualidade de vida após a laringectomia total

Christiane Gouvêa dos Santos; Anke Bergmann; Kaliani Lima Coça; Angela Albuquerque Garcia; Tânia Cristina de Oliveira Valente

Downloads: 0
Views: 297

Abstract

Purpose: to identify the prevalence and factors associated to olfaction disorders and describe the quality of life after total laryngectomy.

Methods: cross-sectional study to evaluate the olfactory acuity and quality of life of total laryngectomized patients in the Instituto Nacional de Cancer through the application of The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, The University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire and the Olfactory Acuity Pre-Rehabilitation of Smell Questionnaire.

Results: 48 total laryngectomized were evaluated, 39 males and 9 females, mean age of 62 years and mean time of 5,6 years after total laryngectomy. In the smell identification test the mean score was 17,9. According to the classification of smell in the test, most participants had some degree of olfaction disorders, only 2 subjects had their smell considered normal. In the The University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire, the composite score was 80.47. The domains that had the lowest scores were taste, saliva and speech. In the Olfactory Acuity Pre-Rehabilitation of Smell Questionnaire, most participants considered their smell bad to reasonable. 21 individuals reported having some degree of difficulty in daily life activities related to olfaction disorders.

Conclusion: the total laringectomized patients showed high prevalence of olfaction disorders, with impairments in their daily life activities.

Keywords

Laryngectomy; Quality of Life; Smell; Olfaction Disorders

Resumo

Objetivo: identificar a prevalência e os fatores associados às alterações do olfato e descrever a qualidade de vida após a laringectomia total.

Métodos: estudo transversal para avaliar a acuidade olfatória e a qualidade de vida de laringectomizados totais no Instituto Nacional de Câncer por meio da aplicação do Teste de Identificação do Olfato da Universidade da Pensilvânia, do Questionário de Qualidade de Vida da Universidade de Washington e do Questionário sobre a Acuidade Olfatória Pré-Reabilitação do Olfato.

Resultados: foram avaliados 48 laringectomizados totais, sendo 39 do sexo masculino e 9 do sexo feminino, com idade média de 62 anos e tempo médio de 5,6 anos desde a laringectomia total. No Teste de Identificação do Olfato a pontuação média foi de 17,9. De acordo com a classificação do olfato no teste, a maioria dos participantes apresentou algum grau de alteração, sendo que apenas 2 indivíduos tiveram o olfato considerado dentro da normalidade. No Questionário de Qualidade de vida da Universidade de Washington, o escore composto foi 80,47. Os domínios que apresentaram as médias de pontos mais baixas foram paladar, saliva e fala. No questionário sobre a acuidade olfatória pré-reabilitação do olfato, a maioria dos participantes consideraram seu olfato de ruim a razoável. 21 indivíduos relataram apresentar algum grau de dificuldade em suas atividades de vida diária em decorrência de alterações do olfato.

Conclusão: os laringectomizados totais apresentaram alta prevalência de alterações do olfato, com comprometimentos relacionados às suas atividades de vida diária.

Palavras-chave

Laringectomia; Qualidade de Vida; Olfato; Transtornos do Olfato

Referencias

1. Vicente LCC, Oliveira PM, Salles PV. Laringectomia Total- Avaliação e Reabilitação. In: Carvalho V, Barbosa EA. Fononcologia. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Revinter, 2012. p. 285-306.

2. Barros APB, Portas JG, Queija DS, Lehn CN, Dedivitis RA. Autopercepção da desvantagem vocal (VHI) e qualidade de vida relacionada à deglutição (SWAL-QOL) de pacientes laringectomizados totais. Rev Bras Cir Cabeça Pescoço. 2007;36(1):32-7.

3. Carmo RD, Camargo Z, Nemr K. Relação entre Qualidade de Vida e Auto-Percepção da Qualidade Vocal de pacientes Laringectomizados Totais: Estudo Piloto. Rev CEFAC. 2006;8(4):518-28.

4. Carrara-de Angelis E, Furia CLB, Mourão LF. Reabilitação Fonoaudiológica das Laringectomias Totais. In: Carrara-de Angelis E, Furia CLB, Mourão LF, Kowalski LP. A Atuação da Fonoaudiologia no Câncer de Cabeça e Pescoço. São Paulo: Lovise, 2000. p.227-38.

5. Manestar D, Ticac R, Maricic S, Malvic G, Corak D, Marjanovic Kavanagh M, Prgomet D, Starcevic R. Amount of airflow required for olfactory perception in laryngectomees: a prospective interventional study. Clin Otolaryngol. 2012;37:28-34.

6. Moor JW, Rafferty A, Sood S. Can laryngectomees smell? Considerations regarding olfactory rehabilitation following total laryngectomy. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 2010;124:361-5.

7. Ward E, Coleman A, Van As CJ, Kerle S. Rehabilitation of olfaction post-laryngectomy: a randomized control trial comparing clinician assisted versus a home practice approach. Clin Otolaryngol. 2010;35(1):39-45.

8. Veyseller B, Ozucer B, Akdoy F, Yildirim YS, Gurbuz D, Balikçi HH et al. Reduced olfactory bulb volume and diminished olfactory function in total laryngectomy patients: A prospective longitudinal study. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012;26:191-3.

9. Fujii M, Fukazawa K, Hatta C, Yasuno H, Sakagami M. Olfactory Acuity after Total Laryngectomy. Chem Senses. 2002;27(2):117-21.

10. Van As-Brooks CJ, Finizia CA, Kerle SM, Ward EC. Rehabilitation of olfaction and taste following total laryngectomy. In: Ward EC, Van As-Brooks CJ. Head and neck cancer: treatment, rehabilitation, and outcomes. San Diego: Plural Publishing, 2014. p. 421-45.

11. Leon EA, Catalanotto FA, Werning JW. Retronasal and Orthonasal Olfactory Ability after Laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133:32-6.

12. Risberg-Berlin B, Karlsson TR, Tuomi L, Finizia C. Effectiveness of olfactory rehabilitation according to a structured protocol with potential of regaining pre-operative levels in laryngectomy patients using nasal airflow-inducing maneuver. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;241:1113-9.

13. Morales-Puebla JM, Morales-Puebla AF, Jiménez-Antolin JA, Muñoz-Platón E, Padilla-Parrado M, Chacón-Martínez J. Olfactory rehabilitation after total laringectomy. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2010;61(2):128-34.

14. Risberg-Berlin B, Rydén A, Moller RY, Finizia C. Effects of total laryngectomy on olfactory function, health-related quality of life, and communication: a 3-year follow-up study. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders. 2009;9(8):9p. Disponível em www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6815/9/8.

15. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(10):1403-9.

16. Doty RL, Shaman P, Kimmelman CP, Dann MS. University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: A rapid quantitative olfactory function test for the clinic. Laryngoscope. 1984;94:176-8.

17. Doty RL. The Smell Identification Test(TM) Administration Manual, Sensonics, Inc., Philadelphia, USA. 1995.

18. Fornazieri MA, Doty RL, Santos CA, Bezerra TF, Pinna FR, Voegels RL. A new cultural adaptation of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test. Clinics. 2013;68(1):65-8.

19. Fornazieri MA, Pinna FR, Bezerra TFP, Antunes MB, Voegels RL. Applicability of the University of Pennsylvania smell identification test (SIT) in Brazilians: pilot study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;76(6):695-9.

20. Silveira-Moriyama L, Azevedo AMS, Ranvaud R, Barbosa ER, Doty RL, Lees AJ. Applying a new version of the Brazilian-Portuguese UPSIT smell test in Brazil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2010;68(5):700-5.

21. Fornazieri MA, Santos CA, Bezerra TFP, Pinna FR, Voegels RL, Doty RL. Development of Normative Data for the Brazilian Adaptation of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test. Chem Senses. 2015;40:141-9.

22. Vartanian JG, Carvalho AL, Yueh B, Furia CLB, Toyota J, McDowell JA. Brazilian-Portuguese validation of the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer. Head and Neck. 2006;28(12):1115-21.

23. Estimativa 2014: Incidência de Câncer no Brasil / Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva, Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2014. 124p. Disponível em: http://www.inca.gov.br acesso em 12 de Ago. 2014.

24. Silva AP, Feliciano T, Freitas SV, Esteves S, Sousa CA. Quality of life in patients submitted to total laryngectomy. J Voice. 2015;29(3):382-8.

25. Wünsch V. The epidemiology of laryngeal cancer in Brazil. São Paulo Med J. 2004;122(5):188-94.

26. Mumovic G, Hocevar-Boltezar I. Olfaction and gustation abilities after a total laryngectomy. Radiol Oncol. 2014;48(3):301-6.

27. Caldas ASC, Facundes VLD, Cunha DA, Balata PMM, Leal LB, Silva HJJ. Gustatory and olfactory dysfunction in laryngectomized patients. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;79(5):546-54.

28. Haxel BR, Fuchs C, Fruth K, Mann WJ, Lippert BM. Evaluation of the "nasal airflow-inducing maneuver" for smell rehabilitation in laryngectomees by means of the sniffin´Sticks test. Clin Otolaryngol Mainz. 2011;36:17-23.

29. Vam-Dam FSAM, Hilgers FJM, Embroek G, Touw FL, Van As CJ, De Jong N. Deterioration of olfaction and gestation as a consequence of total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 1999;109:1150-5.

30. Miani C, Ortolani F, Bracale AMB, Petrelli L, Staffieri A, Marchini M. Olfactory mucosa histological findings in laryngectomees. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;260:529-35.

31. Lee TL, Wang LW, Chang PMH, Chu PY. Quality of life for patients with hypopharyngeal cancer after different therapeutic modalities. Head & Neck. 2013;35(2):280-5.

32. Paula FC, Gama RR. Avaliação de qualidade de vida em laringectomizados totais. Rev Bras Cir Cabeça Pescoço. 2009;38(3):177-82.

33. Op de Coul BMR, Ackerstaff AH, Van As CJ, Van den Hoogen FJA, Meeuwis CA, Manni JJ et al. Quality of life assessment in laringectomized individuals: do we need addition to standard questionnaires in specific clinical research projects? Clin. Otolaryngol. 2005;30:169-75.

34. Miwa T, Furukawa M, Tsukatani T, Constanzo RM, Dinardo LJ, Reiter ER. Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:497-503.

35. Tribius S, Sommer J, Prosch C, Bajrovic A, Muenscher A, Blessmann M et al. Xerostomia after radiotherapy. What matters—mean total dose or dose to each parotid gland? Strahlenther Onkol. 2013;189(3):216-22.

36. Hilgers FJM, Van Dam FSAM, Keyzers S, Koster MN, Van As CJ, Muller MJ. Rehabilitation of Olfaction After Laryngectomy by means of a Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver – the "polite yawning" technique. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:726-32.

37. Cleto ML, Pedalini LM, Júnior JFM. Reativação do Olfato em Laringectomizados Totais. Arq Int Otorrinolaringol. 2005;9(2):102-7.

38. Aschenbrenner K, Hummel C, Teszmer K, Krone F, Ishimaru T, Seo HS, Hummel T. The influence of olfactory loss on dietary behaviors. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:135-44.

39. Mattes RD, Cowart BJ, Schiavo MA, Arnold C, Garrison B, Kare MR, Lowry LD. Dietary evaluation of patients with smell and/or taste disorders. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;51:233-40.

40. Asai JL. Nutrition and the geriatric rehabilitation patient: challenges and solutions. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2004;20:34-45.


Submitted date:
22/07/2015

Accepted date:
20/08/2015

6a2769daa953955d45181462 cefac Articles

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections