Bone-conducted brainstem auditory evoked response: an integrative review
Potencial evocado auditivo de tronco encefálico por condução óssea: uma revisão integrativa
Nathália Raphaela Pessôa Vaz Curado; Lilian Ferreira Muniz; Ana Karollina da Silveira; Adriana Ribeiro de Almeida e Silva; Silvana Maria Sobral Griz
Abstract
The aim of this study was to conduct a integrative review about the procedures used in the acquisition criteria of the exam Auditory Brainstem bone conduction purposes to aid in the diagnosis of hearing problems. Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO): a search of the following databases was performed. We used the following keywords: AEPs, Electrophysiology and Bone Conduction, found via Descriptors in Health Sciences Headings (MeSH). The results shown are for the 35 selected studies. Most studies have opted for the use of click stimuli, with air conduction transducers supra-aural headphones, as the TDH – 39 for stimulation by bone conduction vibrator Radioear B-71, with a pressure of 425+/- 25g. It was observed that the mastoid was positioned over the region where more bone vibrator. Most studies report using alternating polarity, with diverse presentation rate 57.7/s most used and 30-3000 Hz filter with a window of 15 ms duration. To rate the stimulus most studies used 2048, and a total of 2 records stimuli. The Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response is an exam that has been researched for many years and much has been described in the literature on aspects of acquisition and analysis, and highlights the importance of their use in the neonatal population.
Keywords
Resumo
O objetivo deste estudo foi de realizar uma revisão de forma integrativa sobre os procedimentos utilizados nos critérios de aquisição do exame de Potenciais Evocados Auditivos de Tronco Encefálico por condução óssea com fins ao auxílio no diagnóstico de problemas auditivos. Foi realizada uma busca nas seguintes bases de dados: Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (Lilacs), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline) e Scientific Eletronic Library Online (SciELO). Utilizaram-se as seguintes palavras-chave: Potencial Evocado Auditivo, Eletrofisiologia e Condução Óssea, encontrados por meio de Descritores em Ciências da Saúde (DeCS). Os resultados apresentados são referentes aos 35 estudos selecionados. A maioria dos estudos optou pelo uso do estímulo clique, com transdutores por condução aérea os fones supra-aurais, como o TDH-39, para o estímulo por condução óssea, o vibrador Radioear B-71, com pressão de 425+/-25g. Observou-se que a mastoide foi à região onde mais se posicionou mais o vibrador ósseo. A maioria dos estudos refere usar polaridade alternada, com taxa de apresentação diversificada, sendo 57,7/s a mais utilizada e filtro de 30-3000 Hz, com uma janela de 15 ms de duração. Para taxa do estímulo a maioria dos estudos utilizou de 2048, e um total de estímulos de 2 registros. O Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Tronco Encefálico é um exame que vem sendo pesquisado há muitos anos e muito se tem descrito na literatura sobre seus aspectos de aquisição e analise, além de destacar a importância da sua utilização na população neonatal.
Palavras-chave
Referências
1. Pinto FR, Matas CG. Comparação entre limiares de audibilidade e eletrofisiológico por estímulo tone burst. Rev. Bras. Otorrinolaringol. 2007;73(4):513-22.
2. Casali MF, Santos MFC. Auditory Brainstem Evoked Response: response patterns of fullterm and premature. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;76(6):729-38.
3. Matas CG, Magliaro FCL. Introdução aos Potenciais Evocados Auditivos e Potenciais Evocados Auditivos de Tronco Encefálico. In: Bevilacqua MC, Martinez MAN, Balen SA, Pupo AC, Reis ACMB, Frota S. Tratado de udiologia. São Paulo: Livraria Santos Editora Ltda; 2011. P. 181-95.
4. Fernandes LCBC, Gil D, Maria SLS, Azevedo MF. Potencial evocado auditivo de tronco encefálico por via óssea em indivíduos com perda auditiva sensorioneural. Rev CEFAC. 2013;15(3):538-45.
5. Rocha CN, Filippini R, Moreira RR, Neves IF, Schochat E. Potencial evocado auditivo de tronco encefálico com estímulo de fala. Pró-Fono R. de Atual. Cient. 2010;22(4):479-84.
6. Fichino SN, Lewis DR, Fávero ML. Estudo dos limiares eletrofisiológicos das vias aérea e óssea em crianças com até 2 meses de idade. Rev. Bras. Otorrinolaringol. 2007;73(2)251-6.
7. Ramos N, Almeida MG, Lewis DR. Correlação dos achados do PEATE-FE e da avaliação comportamental em crianças com deficiência auditiva. Rev CEFAC. 2013;15(5):796-802.
8. Freitas VS, Alvarenga KF, Morettin M, Souza EF, Costa filho OA. Potenciais Evocados Auditivos do Tronco Encefálico por condução óssea em crianças com malformação de orelha externa e/ou média. Distúrbios da Comunicação. 2006;18(1):9-18.
9. Gorga MP, Kaminski JR, Beauchaine KL, Bergman BM. A Comparison of Auditory Brain Stem Response Thresholds and latencies Elicited by Air- and Bone-Conducted Stimuli. Ear & Hearing. 1993;14(2):85-94.
10. Karzon RK, Cho lieu JE. Initial Audiologic assessment of infants referred from well baby, special care, and neonatal intensive care unit nurseries. American Journal of Audiology. 2006;15:14-24.
11. Kramer SJ. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to bone-conducted stimuli. Audiology. 1992;31(2):61-71.
12. Beattie RC. Normative Wave V Latency–Intensity Functions Using the EARTONE 3A Insert Earphone and the Radioear B-71 Bone Vibrator. Scand Audiol 1998;27:120-6.
13. Boezeman EHJF, Kapteyn TS, Visser SL, Snel AM. Comparison Of The Latencies Between Bone And Air Conduction In The Auditory Brain Stem Evoked Potential. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiologv, Elsevier Scientific Publishers Ireland, Ltd.1983;56:244-7.
14. Boezeman EHJF, Bronkhorstt AW, Kapteynb TS, Houffelaar A, Snel AM. Phase relationship between bone and air conducted impulse signals in the human head. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1984;76(1):111-5.
15. Cornacchia L, Martini A, Morra B. Air and bone conduction brain stem responses in adults and infants. Audiology. 1983;22(5):430-7.
16. Fox JJ, Stapells DR. Normal infant and adult auditory brainstem responses to bone-conducted tones. Audiology. 1993;32:95-109.
17. Freitas VS, Alvarenga KF, Morettin M, Souza EF, Costa filho OA. Bone conduction auditory brainstem responses in normal hearing individuals (original title: Potenciais evocados auditivos do tronco encefálico por condução óssea em indivíduos normais). Pró-Fono R. Atual. Cient. 2006;18(3):323-30.
18. Kaga K, Tanaka Y. Auditory air and bone conduction brainstem responses and damped rotation test for young children with bilateral congenital atresia of the ears. Int. J. Pediatri. Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;32:13-21.
19. Mauldin L, Jerger J. Auditory brain stem evoked responses to bone-conducted signals. Arch. Otolaryngol. 1979;105(11):656-61.
20. Nousak JMK, Stapells DR. Frequency Specificity of the Auditory Brain Stem Response to Bone-Conducted Tones in Infants and Adults. Ear and Hearing. 1992;13(2):87-95.
21. Rahne T, Ehelebe T, Rasinski C, Götze G. Auditory brainstem and cortical potentials following bone-anchored hearing aid stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2010;193:300-6.
22. Schratzenstaller B, Janssen T, Alexiou C, Arnold W. Confirmation of G. von Békésy's Theory of Paradoxical Wave Propagation along the Cochlear Partition by Means of Bone Conducted Auditory Brainstem Responses. ORL. 2000;62:1-8.
23. Schwartz DM, Larson VD, De chicchis AR. Spectral Characteristics of Air and Bone Conduction Transducers used to Record the Auditory Brain Stem Response. Ear and hearin.1985;6(5):274-7.
24. Setou M, Kurauchi T, Tsuzuku T, Kaga K. Binaural interaction of bone-conducted auditory brainstem responses. Acta Otolaryngol 2001;121:486-9.
25. Sheykholeslami K, Mohammad HK, Sébastein S, Kaga K. Binaural interaction of bone-conducted auditory brainstem responses in children with congenital atresia of the external auditory canal. Int. J. Pediatri. Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;67:1083-90.
26. Sohmer H, Freeman S, Geal-dor M, Adelman C, Savion I. BONE conduction experiments in humans – a fluid pathway from bone to ear. Hearing Research. 2000;146:81-8.
27. Stapells DR, Ruben RJ. Auditory Brain Stem responses to bone-conducted tones in infants. Annals of otology, rhinology and laryngology. 1989;98(12):941-9.
28. Stuart A, Yang EY, Stenstrom R, Reindorp AG. Auditory brainstem response thresholds to air and bone conducted clicks in neonates and adults. The American Journal of Otoology. 1993;14(2):176-82.
29. Stuart A, Yang EY. Effect of high-pass filtering on the neonatal auditory brainstem response to air-and bone-conducted clicks. J Speech Hear Res. 1994;37(2):475-9.
30. Stuart A, Yang EY. Gender effects in auditory brainstem responses to air- and bone-conducted clicks in neonates. Journal of Communication Disorders. 2001;34:229-39.
31. Stuart A, Yang EY, Stenstrom R. Effect of Temporal Area Bone Vibrator Placement on Auditory Brain Stem Response in Newborn Infants. Ear and Hearing, 1990;11(5):363-9.
32. Sturzebecher E, Wagner H, Cebulla M, Bischoff M. Frequency-specific brainstem responses to bone-conducted tone pulses masked by notched noise. Audiology. 1996;35(1):45-54.
33. Webb KC, Greenberg HJ. Bone-Conduction Masking for Threshold Assessment in Auditory Brain Stem Response Testing. Ear and hearing. 1983;4(5):261-6.
34. Vander werff KR, Prieve BA, Georgantas LM. Infant Air and Bone Conduction Tone Burst Auditory Brain Stem Responses for Classification of Hearing Loss and the Relationship to Behavioral Thresholds. Ear & hearing. 2009;30(3):350-68.
35. Yang EY, Rupert AL, Moushegian G. A Developmental Study of Bone Conduction Auditory Brain Stem Response in Infants. Ear and hearing. 1987;8(4):244-51.
36. Yang EY, Stuart A, Stenstrom R, Hollett S. Effect of vibrator to head coupling force on the Auditory Brain Stem Response to bone conducted clicks in newborn infants. Ear and Hearing. 1991;12(1):55-60.
37. Yang EY, Stuart A, Stenstrom R, Green WB. Teste-retest variability of the auditory brainstem response to bone-conducted clicks in newborn infants. Audiolog. 1993;32(2):89-94.
38. Yang EY, Stuart A, Mencher GT, Mencher LS, Vincer MJ. Auditory Brain Stem Responses to Air- and Bone-Conducted Clicks in the Audiological Assessment of At-Risk Infants. Ear & Hearing. 1993;14(3):175-82.
39. Ysunza A, Cone-wesson B. Bone conduction masking for brainstem auditory-evoked potentials (BAEP) in pediatric audiological evaluations. Validation of the test. Int. J. Pediatri. Otorhinolaryngol.1987;12:291-302.
40. Ysunza A. Clicks by bone conduction versus bone-conducted masking for evaluation of brain stem auditory evoked potentials in pediatric patients. Bol. Med. Hosp. Infant. Mex. 1985;42(2):99-106.
Submetido em:
20/02/2014
Aceito em:
07/08/2014
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
Email