Revista CEFAC
https://www.revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/1982-021620161818315
Revista CEFAC
Artigos de Revisão

Use of middle latency auditory evoked potentials in children: an integrative review

Uso do potencial evocado auditivo de média latência em populações infantis: uma revisão integrativa

Ana Carla Leite Romero; Anna Caroline Silva de Oliveira; Simone Fiuza Regaçone; Ana Cláudia Figueiredo Frizzo

Downloads: 0
Views: 320

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate on the literature the utility of Auditory middle latency response in children focusing on the study of the auditory system on its normal and deviant processes. The integrative review of the scientific literature consisted in the search for studies using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Scielo. The descriptors used for the search were: "auditory middle latency response" "auditory middle latency potential", and "children" "child", "childhood", "maturation", "development". Selection criteria: The studies were complete papers, which participants were children submitted to examination of the AMRL. The individually analysis of the studies verified the aspects related to the purpose of the research, the applied methodology, and the conclusion of each study. Were selected a total of 21 articles, among them eleven studies from PubMed, eight studies from Scopus, and two studies from Scielo. Of the total 21 articles, six of them were performed with healthy children, four examined the components of this potential in children with language disorders or specific language disorder, four studies assessed children with cochlear implants and seven children with other changes. This integrative review showed the importance of research auditory middle latency response in children. Based on this, a more accurate and early diagnosis of patients with alterations language, speech or learning and auditory processing disorders were allowed. Moreover, it was observed the evolution on theraupeutic monitoring.

Keywords

Child; Child Development; Evoked Potentials, Auditory; Hearing; Hearing Tests

Resumo

Este estudo teve como objetivo investigar na literatura a utilidade do Potencial evocado auditivo de média latência na população infantil para o estudo do sistema auditivo em seus processos normais e desviantes. A revisão integrativa da literatura científica consistiu na busca de estudos utilizando as bases de dados: PubMed, Scopus e Scielo. Como descritores para a pesquisa foram utilizados os termos: "auditory middle latency response" "auditory middle latency potential", "children", "child", "childhood", "maturation' e "development". Os estudos eram artigos completos, cujos participantes foram crianças, submetidas ao exame de Potencial evocado auditivo de média latência. A análise dos estudos individualmente verificou aspectos relacionados ao objetivo da pesquisa, a metodologia utilizada e a conclusão de cada estudo. Foram selecionados e lidos na íntegra um total de 11 estudos da base bibliográfica PubMed, oito estudos da Scopus e dois estudos da Scielo. Do total de 21 artigos, seis deles foram realizados com crianças saudáveis, quatro examinaram os componentes desse potencial em crianças com distúrbio de linguagem ou distúrbio específico de linguagem, quatro estudos avaliaram crianças usuárias de implante coclear, e sete crianças com outras alterações. Esta revisão integrativa mostrou a importância da investigação dos potenciais evocados auditivos de média latência em crianças. Tal avaliação vem permitindo um diagnóstico mais precoce e preciso de pacientes com alterações de linguagem, fala ou de aprendizado e de distúrbios do processamento auditivo além do monitoramento de evolução terapêutica.

Palavras-chave

Criança; Desenvolvimento Infantil; Potenciais Evocados Auditivos; Audição; Testes auditivos

Referências

1. Hall J. Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2006.

2. Goldstein R, Rodman LB. Early components of averaged evoked responses to rapidly repeated auditory stimuli. J Speech Lang Hear Res.1967;10:697-705.

3. Musiek FE, Lee WW. Potenciais auditivos de média e longa latência. In: Musiek FE, Lee WW. Perspectivas atuais em avaliação auditiva. São Paulo: Manole; 2001. p. 239-67.

4. Weihing J, Schochat E, Musiek F. Ear and electrode effects educe within-group variability in middle latency response amplitude measures. Int J Audiol. 2012;51:405-12.

5. Kraus N, Ian Smith D, Reed NL, Stein LK, Cartee C. Auditory middle latency responses in children: Effects of age and diagnostic category. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1985;62(5):343-51.

6. Munhoz MSL, Caovilla HH, Silva MLG, Ganança MM. Audiologia Clínica. São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Belo Horizonte: Atheneu; 2000.

7. Simões MB, Souza RR, Schochat E. Efeito da supressão nas vias auditivas: um estudo com os potenciais de média e longa latência. Rev CEFAC. 2009;11(1):150-7.

8. Frizzo ACF, Issac ML, Fernandes ACP, Menezes PL, Funayama CAR. Auditory middle latency response in children with learning difficulties. Int. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;16(3):335-40.

9. Arehole S, Augustine LE, Simhadri R. Middle latency response in children with learning disabilities: preliminary findings. J Commun Disord. 1995;28(1):21-38.

10. Kurnaz M, Satar B, Yetiser S. Evaluation of cochlear implant users performance using middle and late latencyresponses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266(3):343-50.

11. Rodríguez HS, Corral M, Cadaveira F. Middle-latency auditory evoked potentials in children at high risk for alcoholism. J Epilepsy Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;31(1):40-7.

12. Romero ACL, Sorci BB, Frizzo ACF. Relação entre potenciais evocados auditivos de média latência e distúrbio de processamento auditivo: estudo de casos. Rev CEFAC. 2013;15(2):478-84.

13. ASHA: American Speech and Hearing Association. Rockville: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Task Force on Central Auditory Processing Concensus. Am J Audiol. 1996;5:80-4.

14. Luoa JJ, Khuranac DS, Kotharec SV. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials and middle latency auditory evoked potentials in young children. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2013;20:383-8.

15. Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA. Effect of increasing duration of stimulation on the electrically evoked auditorybrainstem and middle latency responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;37(4):559-64.

16. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Effects of cochlear implant use on the electrically evoked middle latency response in children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005;204(1-2):78-89.

17. Lamas A, López-Herce J, Sancho L, Mencía S, Carrillo A, Santiago MJ et al. Bispectral index and middle latency auditory evoked potentials in children younger than two-years-old. J Anesth Analg. 2008;106(2):426-32.

18. Schochat E, Musiek FE, Alonso R, Ogata J. Effect of auditory training on the middle latency response in children with (central) auditory processing disorder. Braz. J Med Biol Res. 2010;43(8):777-85.

19. Al-Saif SS, Abdeltawwab MM, Khamis M. Auditory middle latency responses in children with specific language impairment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(6):1697-702.

20. Frizzo ACF, Funayama CAR, Isaac ML, Colafêmina JF. Potenciais Evocados Auditivos de Média Latência: estudo em crianças saudáveis. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2007;73(3):398-403.

21. Nelson MD, Hall JW, Jacobson GP. Factors affecting the recordability of auditory evoked response component Pb (P1). Am J Audiol. 1997;8(2):89-99.

22. Mason SM, Mellor DH. Brainstem, middle latency and late cortical evoked potentials in children with speech and language disorders. Electroencephalogr. Clin Neurophysiol. 1984;59(4):297-309.

23. Psillas G, Daniilidis J. Low-frequency hearing assessment by middlelatency responses in children with pervasive developmental disorder. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;67:613-9.

24. Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV,Gordon KA. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. Part I: Duration effects. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;244:7-14.

25. Wioland N, Rudolf G, Metz-Lutz MN. Electrophysiological evidence of persisting unilateral auditory cortex dysfunction in the late outcome of Landau and Kleffner syndrome. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:319-23.

26. Leite RA, Wertzner HF, Gonçalves IC, Magliaro FCL, Matas CG. Auditory evoked potentials: predicting speech therapyoutcomes in children with phonological disorders. Rev Clinics. 2014;69(3):212-8.

27. Lamas A, Herce JL, Sancho L, Mencía S, Carrillo A, Santiago MJ et. al. Analysis of Bispectral Index and Middle Latency Auditory-Evoked Potentials Parameters in Critically Ill Children. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;26(3):150-4.

28. Magliaro FCL, Scheuer CI, Júnior FBA, Matas CG. Estudo dos potenciais evocados auditivos em autismo. Pró-Fono Rev Atual Cient. 2010;22(1):31-6.


Submetido em:
16/06/2015

Aceito em:
22/10/2015

6a1ae41da9539560e62b5535 cefac Articles

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections