Revista CEFAC
https://www.revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/S1516-18462008005000005
Revista CEFAC
Linguagem

Relação entre indícios de disgrafia funcional e desempenho acadêmico

Correlation between indication of disgraphy and scholarship performance

Sônia das Dores Rodrigues; Maria José Martins Gomes de Castro; Sylvia Maria Ciasca

Downloads: 0
Views: 163

Resumo

Objetivo: avaliar a relação entre sinais indicativos de disgrafia e desempenho acadêmico.

Métodos: foram incluídas no estudo 25 crianças, matriculadas na 3ª. série do ensino fundamental de uma escola pública da Região Metropolitana de Campinas/SP, sem histórico de lesão cerebral e/ou déficit intelectual. Quanto à idade, 21 tinham nove anos e quatro tinham dez anos; 12 eram do sexo masculino. A avaliação foi realizada por meio da Escala de Disgrafia (Lorenzini, 1993) e do Teste de Desempenho Escolar (TDE) (Stein, 2003).

Resultados: seis crianças apresentaram sinais indicativos de disgrafia. A maioria dos alunos teve desempenho acadêmico classificado como inferior em escrita (15/25) e em aritmética (10/25). As crianças com indícios de disgrafia (6/25) tiveram pior desempenho em escrita e aritmética no TDE, quando comparado às demais crianças, porém essa diferença não foi estatisticamente significativa.

Conclusão: conclui-se que, neste grupo, não foi possível estabelecer a relação entre baixo desempenho acadêmico com escrita disgráfica, uma vez que tal dificuldade também foi identificada também entre as crianças consideradas não disgráficas.

Palavras-chave

Transtornos de Aprendizagem; Disgrafia; Cognição

Abstract

Purpose: to evaluate the relationship between indicative signals of written difficulties and cadmic performance.

Methods: twenty five children, students from the 3rd grade in the elementary education school of a public school in the metropolitan area of Campinas/SP took part in this study (12 boys), with age varying between 9 and 10. The tools used for evaluation were the scale of written difficulties (Lorenzini, 1993) and the test of school performance (Stein, 2003).

Results: considering the group performance, it was verified that a great number of students had written academic (15/25) and arithmetic (10/25) difficulties. The children with indicative signals of written difficulties (6/25) had inferior performance in writing and arithmetic, when compared to the ones who did not have difficulties. However, this difference was not significant.

Conclusion: we can conclude that in this group, it wasn't possible to correlate academic difficulty to writing difficulty, since it was that such academic difficulty was also identified among the children who did not have written difficulties.

Keywords

Learning Disorders; Dysgraphia; Cognition

References

1. Feder KP, Majnemer A. Handwriting development, competency and intervention. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007; 49(4):312-7.

2. Bernie C, Rodger S. Cognitive strategy use in school-aged children with developmental coordination disorder. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2004; 24(4):23-45.

3. Freeman AR, Mackinnon JR, Miller LT. Keyboarding for students with handwriting problems: a literature review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2005; 25(1/2):119-47.

4. Feder KP, Majnemer A, Bourbonnais D, Platt R, Blayney M, Synnes A. Handwriting performance in preterm children compared with term peers at age 6 to 7 years. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005; 47(3):163-70.

5. Graham S, Struck M, Santoro J, Berninger VW. Dimensions of good and poor handwriting legibility in first and second grades: motor programs, visual-spatial arrangement and letter formation parameter setting. Dev Neuropsychol. 2006; 29(1):43-60.

6. Rosenblum S, Chevion D, Weiss PL. Using data visualization and signal processing to characterize the handwriting process. Pediatr Rehabil. 2006; 9(4):404-17.

7. Rosenblum S, Dvorkin AY, Weiss PL. Automatic segmentation as a tool for examining the handwriting process of children with dysgraphic and proficient handwriting. Hum Mov Sci. 2006; 25(4/5):608-21.

8. Volman MJM, Van Schendel BM, Jongmans MJ. Handwriting difficulties in primary school children: a search for underlying mechanisms. Am J Occup Ther. 2006; 60(4):451-60.

9. Naider-Steinhart S, Katz-Leurer M. Analysis of proximal and distal muscle activity during handwriting tasks. Am J Occup Ther. 2007; 61(4):392-8.

10. Denton PL, Cope S, Moser C. The effects of sensorimotor-based intervention versus therapeutic practice on improving handwriting performance in 6- to 11-year-old children. Am J Occup Ther. 2006; 60(1):16-27.

11. Asher AV. Handwriting instruction in elementary schools. Am J Occup Ther. 2006; 60(4):461-71.

12. Ratzon NZ, Efraim D, Bart O. A short-term graphomotor program for improving writing readiness skills of first-grade students. Am J Occup Ther. 2007; 61(4):399-405.

13. Ajuriaguerra J. Manual psiquiatria infantil. São Paulo: Masson do Brasil; 1980. 952p.

14. Gubay SS, De Klerk NH. A study and review of developmental dysgraphia in relation to acquired dysgraphia. Brain Dev. 1995; 17(1):1-8.

15. Vlachos F, Karapetsas A. Visual memory deficit in children with dysgraphia. Percept Mot Skills. 2003; 97(3Pt2):1281-8.

16. Lofiego JL. Disgrafia: avaliação fonoaudiológica. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 1995. 290 p.

17. Ciasca SM, Capellini SA, Tonelotto JMF. Distúrbios específicos de aprendizagem. In: Ciasca SM. Distúrbios de aprendizagem: proposta de avaliação interdisciplinar. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo; 2003. p. 55-65.

18. Lorenzini VL. Uma escala para detectar a disgrafia baseada na escala de Ajuriaguerra [dissertação]. São Carlos (SP): Universidade Federal de São Carlos; 1993.

19. Stein LM. TDE – Teste de desempenho escolar: manual para aplicação e interpretação. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo; 2003. 35p.

20. Oliveira RMSG. Aplicação da escala de disgrafia em crianças com e sem dificuldade na escrita [dissertação]. Marília (SP): Universidade de Marília; 2000.

21. Guimarães IE, Rodrigues SD, Ciasca SM. Diagnóstico do distúrbio de aprendizagem. In: Ciasca SM. Distúrbio de Aprendizagem: proposta de avaliação interdisciplinar. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo; 2003. p. 67-89.

22. Lefèvre BH. Avaliação neuropsicológica da criança. In: Diament A, Cypel S. Neurologia infantil. 2. ed. São Paulo: Atheneu; 1989. p. 111-42.

23. Ciasca SM. Distúrbios e dificuldades de aprendizagem: questão de nomenclatura. In: Ciasca SM. Distúrbios de aprendizagem: proposta de avaliação interdisciplinar. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo; 2003. p. 19-31.

24. O'Hare A. Dysgraphia and dyscalculia. In: WhitmoreK,HartH, WillemsG.Aneurodevelopmental approach to specific learning disorders. Londres: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p.97-118.

25. Artigas-Pallarés J. Problemas associados a la dyslexia. Rev Neurol. 2002; 34(suppl 1): S7-S13.

26. Tucha O, Lange KW. The effect of conscious control on handwriting in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Atten Disord. 2005; 9(1):323-32.

27. Flapper BC, Houwen S, Schoemaker MM. Fine motor skills and effects of methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder and developmental coordination disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006; 48(3):165-9.

28. Lange KW, Tucha L, Walitza S, Gerlach M, Linder M, Tucha O. Interaction of attention and graphomotor functions in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2007; (72):249-59.

29. Mayes SD, Calhoun SL. Learning, attention, writing, and processing speed in typical children and children with ADHD, autism, anxiety, depression, and oppositional-defiant disorder. Child Neuropsychol. 2007; 13(6):469-93.

30. Adi-Japha E, Landau YE, Frenkel L, Teicher M, Gross-Tsur V, Shalev RS. ADHD and dysgraphia: underling mechanisms. Cortex. 2007; 43(6):700-9.

31. Racine MB, Majnemer A, Shevell M, Snider L. Handwriting performance in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). J Child Neurol. 2008; 23(4):399-406.


Submitted date:
08/14/2007

Accepted date:
02/14/2008

6a502911a95395784827f1aa cefac Articles
Links & Downloads

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections