Avaliação da satisfação dos usuários de aparelho de amplificação sonora individual – revisão sistemática
Assessment of hearing aids users' satisfaction – systematic review
Fabiani Figueiredo Magalhães; Maria Fernanda Capoani Garcia Mondelli
Resumo
Tema: satisfação de usuários de aparelho de amplificação sonora individual (AASI).
Objetivo: avaliar o nível de satisfação dos usuários de AASI por meio da aplicação do questionário Satisfaction With Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) e realizar revisão sistemática dos artigos selecionados para o estudo.
Conclusão: o SADL demonstrou ser um instrumento adequado para identificar a satisfação do usuário de AASI, com fácil aplicabilidade e voltado ao uso clínico.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Background: user satisfaction on hearing aids (HA).
Purpose: to ascertain the level of user satisfaction with hearing aids through the application of the questionnaire Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) and performing a systematic review of articles selected for the study.
Conclusion: the SADL proved to be an adequate tool in order to identify user satisfaction with hearing aid, with easy application and returned towards the clinical use.
Keywords
Referências
1. Silman S, Iório MCM, Mizhahi MM, Parra VM. Próteses auditivas: um estudo sobre seu benefício na qualidade de vida de indivíduos portadores de perda auditiva neurossensorial. Distúrb. Com. 2004;16(2):153-65.
2. Veras RP, Mattos LC. Audiology and Aging: literature review and current horizons. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2007;73(1):128-34.
3. Ruschel CV, Carvalho CR, Guarinello AC. A eficiência de um programa de reabilitação audiológica em idosos com presbiacusia e seus familiares. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2007;12(2):95-8.
4. Sandlin RE. Sound Field Assessment: Hearing Aids and Related Issues. In: Sandlin RE. Hearing Aid Amplification: Technical and Clinical Considerations. 2nd ed. San Diego, California: Singular Publishing Group; 2000. p. 343-68.
5. Hosford-Dunn H, Hush JL. Acceptance Benefit and Satisfaction Measures of Hearing Aid User Attitudes. In: Sandlin RE. Hearing Aid Amplification: Technical and Clinical Considerations. 2nd ed. San Diego, California: Singular Publishing Group; 2000: 467-88.
6. Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: The SADL Scale. Ear and Hearing. 1999;20: 306-20.
7. Hosford-Dunn H, Halpern J. Clinical application of the satisfaction with amplification in daily life scale in private practice I: Statistical, content and factorial validity. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11:523-39.
8. Hosford-Dunn H, Halpern J. Clinical application of the SADL scale in private practice II: predictive validity of fitting variables Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life. J Am Acad Audiol. 2001;12(1):15-36.
9. Cox RM, Alexander GC. Validation of the SADL Questionnaire. Ear and Hearing. 2001;22:151-60.
10. Veiga LR, Merlo ARC, Mengue SS. Satisfação com a prótese auditiva na vida diária em usuários do sistema de saúde do Exército. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2005;71(1):67-73.
11. Soares DO, Tavares RA, Ferreira RT, Guglielmino G, Dinato C, Franchi VM. Satisfação dos usuários de prótese auditiva em seu dia-a-dia. Acta ORL/Técnicas em Otorrinolaringologia. 2007;25:290-2.
12. Carvalho JSA. Satisfação de idosos com aparelhos auditivos concedidos no estado do Tocantins. Arquivos Intern de Otorrinolaring 2007;11:462-70.
13. Lessa AH, Costa MJ, Becker KT, Vaucher VA. Satisfação do usuários de próteses auditivas, com perda auditiva de graus severo e profundo. Arq. Int. Otorrinolaringol. 2010;14(3):338-45.
14. Farias RB, Russo ICP. Saúde auditiva: estudo do grau de satisfação de usuários de aparelho de amplificação sonora individual. Rev. soc. bras. fonoaudiol. 2010;15(1): 26-31.
15. Gordo A, Scharlach RC, Iório MCM. Avaliação do benefício de próteses auditivas com diferentes tipos de processamento do sinal por meio da aplicação do questionário APHAB. Distúrb com. 2005;17(2):191-202.
16. Cox RM. Evidence-based practice in provision of amplification. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16(7):419-38.
17. Russo ICP. Distúrbios da Audição: A Presbiacusia. In: Russo ICP. Intervenção Fonoaudiológica na Terceira Idade. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Revinter; 1999. p. 51-92.
18. Bongiovani R. Principles of Posfitting Rehabilitation. In: Sandlin RE. Hearing Aid Amplification: Technical and Clinical Considerations. 2nd Edition. San Diego, California: Singular Publishing Group; 2000. p. 439-66.
19. Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, Hart J, Kimber A, Storey L, Thomas H. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 2002; 6:1-256.
20. Humes LE, Wilson DL, Humes L, Barlow NN, Garner CB. A comparison of two measures of hearing aid satisfaction in a group of elderly hearing aid wearers. Ear Hear. 2002;223(5):422-7.
21. Mcleod B, Upfold L, Broadbent C. An investigation of the applicability of the inventory, satisfaction with amplification in daily life, at 2 weeks post hearing aid fitting. Ear Hear. 2001;22(4):342-7.
22. Saunders GH, Forsline A. The performance-perceptual test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction. Ear Hear. 2006;27(3):229-42.
23. Shi LF, Doherty KA, Kordas TM, Pellegrino JT. Short-term and long-term hearing aid benefit and user satisfaction: a comparison between two fitting protocols. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(6):482-95.
24. Desjardins JL, Doherty KA. Do experienced hearing aid users know how to use their hearing aids correctly? Am J Audiol. 2009;18(1):69-76.
25. Cienkowski KM, McHugh MS, McHugo GJ, Musiek FE, Cox RM, Baird JC. A computer method for assessing satisfaction with hearing aids. Int J Audiol. 2006;45(7):393-9.
26. Moeller MP, Hoover B, Peterson B, Stelmachowicz P. Consistency of hearing aid use in infants with early-identified hearing loss. Am J Audiol. 2009;18(1):14-23.
27. Takahashi G, Martinez CD, Beamer S, Bridges J, Noffsinger D, Sugiura K, et al. Subjective measures of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction in the NIDCD/VA follow-up study. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(4):323-49.
28. Uriarte M, Denzin L, Dunstan A, Sellars J, Hickson L. Measuring hearing aid outcomes using the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaire: Australian data. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16(6):383-402.
29. Ou H, Dunn CC, Bentler RA, Zhang X. Measuring cochlear implant satisfaction in postlingually deafened adults with the SADL inventory. J Am Acad Audiol. 2008;19(9):721-34.
30. Roup CM; Noe CM. Hearing aid outcomes for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. Am J Audiol. 2009;18(1):45-52.
31. Saunders GH, Jutai JW. Hearing specific and generic measures of the psychosocial impact of hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 2004;15(3):238-48.
Submetido em:
01/03/2010
Aceito em:
06/11/2010
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
Email