Revista CEFAC
https://www.revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/S1516-18462011005000062
Revista CEFAC
Original Articles

Analysis of the risk factors for stuttering in disfluent children without familial recurrence

Análise dos fatores de risco para gagueira em crianças disfluentes sem recorrência familial

Cristiane Moço Canhetti de Oliveira; Heloisa Aparecida de Souza; Ana Claudia dos Santos; Denise de Souza Cunha

Downloads: 0
Views: 247

Abstract

Purpose: to analyze the following factors: gender, age, type of the onset of disfluencies, duration and typology of disfluencies; physical and emotional stresses and communicative and qualitative factors associated in children with high risk for stuttering and without familial recurrence of the disorder.

Method: 43 children with high risk for developing mental sporadic stuttering of both genders. Data were gathered through the Protocol of Risk for Stuttering Developmental- PRGD.

Results: the ratio male to female was 3.3:1. The occurrence of communicative factors associated in males (p=0.003) was the only statistically significant difference in the analyzed risk factors in male and female. There was a resemblance concerning the findings between male and female: Concerning the duration of the disfluencies, the majority showed more than twelve months of duration, the stuttering-like disfluencies (SLD) were more frequent, the presence of emotional stresses occurred in the majority of the children, and lastly, the qualitative factors associated, such as fast speech rate, tension, and lack of coordination between respiration and phonation were found in most samples.

Conclusion: the results of this study suggest that in children with high risk for sporadic stuttering there occurs the interaction of numerous factors, suggesting that this disorder is multifactorial. It was also possible to conclude that the interaction of some risk factors such as male gender, stuttering-like disfluencies (SLD) manifested by more than 12 months with persistent onset, in the presence of communicative and qualitative factors associated may represent increased risk for developing persistent stuttering.

Keywords

Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences; Speech; Stuttering; Risk Factors; Speech Disorders

Resumo

Objetivo: analisar os fatores gênero, idade, tipo de surgimento da gagueira, tempo de duração e tipologia das disfluências, fatores estressantes físicos e emocionais, e fatores comunicativos e qualitativos associados em crianças disfluentes sem recorrência familial do distúrbio.

Método: participaram 43 crianças com alto risco para a gagueira de ambos os gêneros. A coleta de dados foi realizada por meio do Protocolo de Risco para a Gagueira do Desenvolvimento – PRGD.

Resultados: a razão masculino/feminino foi de 3,3:1. A única diferença estatisticamente significante dos fatores de risco analisados nos gêneros masculino e feminino foi a maior ocorrência de fatores comunicativos associados no gênero masculino (p=0,003). Houve uma semelhança dos achados entre os meninos e as meninas: quanto ao tempo de duração das disfluências a maioria apresentou mais de 12 meses de duração, a tipologia gaga foi a mais freqüente, a presença de fatores estressantes emocionais ocorreu na maior parte das crianças, e finalmente os fatores qualitativos associados, como taxa de elocução aumentada, tensão visível e incoordenação pneumo-fono-articulatória estiveram presentes em grande parte da amostra.

Conclusão: os resultados desta investigação permitiram concluir que nos casos de crianças com alto risco para a gagueira isolada ocorreu a interação de inúmeros fatores, sugerindo que o distúrbio é multifatorial. Também foi possível concluir que a interação de alguns fatores como gênero masculino, tipologia gaga manifestada por mais de 12 meses, com início persistente, na presença de fatores qualitativos e comunicativos associados pode representar risco maior para o desenvolvimento da gagueira persistente.

Palavras-chave

Fonoaudiologia; Fala; Gagueira; Fatores de Risco; Distúrbios da Fala

References

1. Smith A, Kelly E. Stuttering: A dynamic, multifactorial model. In: Curlee RF, Siegel GM. (Org) Nature and treatment of stuttering: New directions. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon. 1997;p. 204-17.

2. Ajdacic-Gross V, Vetter S, Müller M, Kawohl W, Frey F, Lupi G et al. Risk factor for stuttering: a secondary analysis of a large data base. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010; 260(4):279-86.

3. Bothe AK, Davidow JH, Bramlett RE, Ingham RJ. Stuttering treatment research, 1970-2005. I. Systematic review incorporating trial quality assessment of behavioral, cognitive, and related approaches. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2006; 15:321-41.

4. Einarsdóttir J, Ingham RJ. The effect of stuttering measurement training on judging stuttering occurrence in preschool children who stutter. J Fluency Disord. 2008; 33:167-79.

5. Dworzynski K, Remington A, Rijsdijk F, Howell P, Plomin R. Genetic etiology in cases of recovered and persistent stuttering in an unselected, longitudinal sample of young twins. Amer J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007; 16:169-78.

6. Brosch S, Winkler S. Diagnostics and therapy of stuttering children. Laryngorhi. 2008; 87(7):519-23.

7. Yairi E. Subtyping stuttering I: A review. J Fluency Disord. 2007; 32:165-96.

8. Oliveira CMC, Souza HA, Santos AC, Cunha D, Giacheti CM. Fatores de risco na gagueira desenvolvimental familial e isolada. Rev CEFAC [periódico na Internet]. [acesso em 13 dez 2010]. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462010005000116&lng=en. Prelo 2010. Epub Oct 29, 2010. doi: 10.1590/S1516-18462010005000116.

9. Poulos MG, Webster WG. Family history as a basis for subgrouping people who stutter. J Speech Hear Res. 1991; 34:5-10.

10. Felsenfeld S, Kirk KM, Zhu G, Statham DJ, Neale MC, Martin NG. A study of the genetic and environmental etiology of stuttering in a selected twin sample. Behav Genet. 2000; 5:359-66.

11. Andrade CRF. Gagueira infantil: risco, diagnóstico e programas terapêuticos. Barueri: Pró Fono; 2006.

12. Ambrose NG, Cox NJ, Yairi E. The genetic basis of persistence and recovery in stuttering. J Speech Hear Res. 1997; 40:567-80.

13. Craig A, Hancok K, Tran Y, Craig M, Peters K. Epidemiology of stuttering in the community across the entire life span. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002; 45:1097-105.

14. Craig A, Tran Y. The epidemiology of stuttering: The need for reliable estimates of prevalence and anxiety levels over the lifespan. Advan Speech-Lang Pathol. 2005; 7:41-6.

15. Yairi E, Ambrose NG. Early childhood stuttering: for clinicians by clinicians. Austin: Pro-Ed; 2005.

16. Yairi E, Ambrose NG. A longitudinal study of stuttering in children: a preliminary report. J Speech Hear Res.1992; 35(4):755-60.

17. Bloodstein O. Some empirical observations about early stuttering: A possibly link to language development. J Commun Disord. 2006; 30:185-91

18. Wagovich SA, Hall NE, Cliffor BA. Speech disruptions in relation to language growth in children who stutter: An exploratory study. J Fluency Disord. 2009; 34(4):242-56.

19. Wittke-Thompson JK, Ambrose N, Yairi EC, Cook EH, Ober C. et al. Genetics studies of stuttering in a founder population J Fluency Disord. 2007; 32:33-50.

20. Bakhtiar M, Seifpanahi S, Ansari H, Ghanadzade M, Packman A. Investigation of the reliability of the SSI-3 for preschool Persian-speaking children who stutter. J Fluency Disord. 2010; 35(2):87-91.

21. Reilly S, Onslow M, Packman A, Wake M, Bavin EL, Prior M, Eadie P, Cini E, Bolzonello C, Ukoumunne OC. Predicting stuttering onset by age of 3 years: A prospective, community cohort study. Pediatrics. 2009; 123:270-7.

22. Logan KJ, Mullins MS, Jones KM. The depiction of stuttering in contemporary juvenile fiction: implications for clinical practice. Psychol Schools. 2008; 45(7):609-26.

23. Yairi E, Ambrose NG, Paden EP, Throneburg RN. Predictive factors of persistence and recovery: pathways of childhood stuttering. J Fluency Disord. 1996; 29:51-77.

24. Sawyer J, Yairi E. The effect of sample size on the assessment of stuttering severity. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2006; 15:36-44.

25. Suresh R, Ambrose N, Roe C, Pluzhnikov A, Wittke-Thompson JK, Ng MCY. et al. New complexities in the genetivs of stuttering: Significant sex-specific linkage signals. Am J Hum Genet. 2006; 78:554-63.

26. Smith A, Sadagopan N, Walsh B, Weber-Fox C. Increasing phonological complexity reveals heightened instability in inter-articulatory coordination in adults who stutter. J Fluency Disord. 2010; 35:1-18.

27. Craig A, Tran Y. Chronic and social anxiety in people who stutter. Adv Psychiat Treat. 2006; 12:63-8.

28. Andrews G, Graig A, Feyer AM, Hoddinott S, et al. (1983). Stuttering: a review of research findings and theories circa 1982. J Speech Hear Disord. 1983; 48:226-46.

29. Bloodstein O. A handbook on stuttering. Chicago: National Easter Seal Society, 1995.


Submitted date:
12/29/2010

Accepted date:
03/23/2011

6a3db570a9539526d72e9592 cefac Articles
Links & Downloads

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections