Revista CEFAC
https://www.revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/S1516-18462011005000127
Revista CEFAC
Original Articles

Efectos acústicos inmediatos de una secuencia de ejercicios vocales con tubos de resonancia

Immediate effects of a vocal exercise sequence with resonance tubes

Marco Guzmán; Diego Higueras; Catherine Fincheira; Daniel Muñoz; Carlos Guajardo

Downloads: 0
Views: 248

Resumen

Objetivo: el propósito de este estudio es conocer el efecto acústico inmediato de una secuencia de ejercicios fonatorios utilizando tubos de resonancia en un grupo de sujetos disfónicos.

Método: se aplicó una secuencia única de cuatro tareas fonatorias dentro de tubos de resonancia a veinticuatro profesores con voces disfónicas, evaluadas perceptualmente con la escala GRBAS. Las muestras de voz fueron grabadas antes y después de la secuencia de ejercicios. El análisis acústico incluyó Cepstrum, Jitter, Shimmer y relación armónico-ruido (NHR). Se solitó completar un protocolo de autovaloración vocal posterior a la secuencia de ejercicios para evaluar los efectos subjetivos. Se compararon los valores de los parámetros acústicos en las muestras pre y post entrenamiento.

Resultados: cambios significativos fueron obtenidos en el análisis Cepstral, Jitter y relación armónico-ruido. En la autovaloración, los efectos positivos predominaron sobre los negativos, siendo los principales: voz más estable, voz más clara y garganta más abierta.

Conclusión: el uso de tareas fonatorias dentro de tubos de resonancia puede tener un efecto fisiológico terapéutico inmediato en sujetos con voces disfónicas y una percepción subjetiva de mejoría en la producción de la voz posterior a la terapia.

Palabras clave

Voz; Entrenamiento de la Voz; Acústica

Abstract

Purpose: the purpose of this study is to determine the immediately acoustic effect of phonatory exercise sequence using resonance tubes in a group of dysphonic subjects.

Method: a unique sequence of four phonatory tasks within resonance tubes was applied in twenty-four teachers with dysphonic voices, assessed perceptually with GRBAS scale. Voice samples were recorded before and after the exercise sequence. Acoustic analysis included the following items: Cepstrum, Jitter, Shimmer, noise-harmonic ratio (NHR). Subjects were asked to fill out a vocal self-assessment protocol after the exercise sequence in order to assess the subjective effects of these exercises. Acoustic parameters of voice samples pre and post training were compared.

Results: significant changes were obtained in the Cepstral analysis, jitter and harmonic-to-noise ratio. In the self-assessment, positive effects prevailed over the negative ones, being the main, as follows: more steady voice, more clear voice and more open throat sensation.Conclusion: the outcome indicates that the use of phonatory tasks with resonance tubes may have immediate therapeutic physiological effects on subjects with hoarse voices and a subjective perception of improvement in voice production after the therapy.

Keywords

Voice; Voice Training; Speech Acoustics

Referencias

1. Nix J, Simpson C. Semi-occluded vocal tract postures and their applications in the singing voice studio. J Singing. 2008;64(3):339-42.

2. Titze I, Laukkanen A. Can vocal economy in phonation be increased with an artificially lengthened vocal tract? A computer modeling study. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2007;32(4):147-56.

3. Cecconello L. Ejercicios de tracto vocal semi-ocluido, XII Jornadas Foniátricas, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, San Luis, Argentina, 2009, CD ROM, ISBN 978-987-1595-02-0.

4. Simberg S, Laine A. The resonance tube method in voice therapy: Description and practical Implementations. Logop Phon Vocology. 2007;32(4):165-70.

5. Laukkanen A, Titze I, Hoffman H, Finnegan E. Effects of a Semioccluded Vocal Tract on Laryngeal Muscle Activity and Glottal Adduction in a Single Female Subject. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;60(6):298–311.

6. Titze I, Finnegan E, Laukkanen A, Jaiswal S. Raising lung pressure and pitch in vocal warm-ups: the use of flow-resistant straws. J Singing. 2002;58(4):329–38.

7. Simberg S. Prevalence of vocal symptoms and voice disorders among teacher students and teachers and a model of early intervention. Finland: University of Helsinki, Department of Speech Sciences; 2004

8. Laukkanen A, Pulakka H, Alku P, Vilkman E, Hertegård S, Lindestad PA, Larsson H, Granqvist S. High-speed registration of phonation-related glottal area variation during artificial lengthening of the vocal tract. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2007;32(4):157-64.

9. Titze I. Voice training and therapy with a semi-occluded vocal tract: rationale and scientific underpinnings. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006; 49(2):448–59.

10. Story B, Laukkanen A, Titze I. Acoustic impedance of an artificially lengthened and constricted vocal tract. J Voice. 2000;14(4):455–69.

11. Rothenberg M. Source-tract acoustic interaction and voice quality. In: Lawrence VL, editor. Transcripts of the 12th Symposium Care of Professional Voice, Part I. New York, NY: The Voice Foundation; 1983. p. 25-31.

12. Gaskill C. Erickson, M. 2010. The effect of an artificially lengthened vocal tract on estimated glottal contact quotient in untrained male voices. J Voice, 24, 57-71.

13. Titze I, Story B. Acoustic interactions of the voice source with the lower vocal tract. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;101(4):2234-43.

14. Laukkanen AM. About the so called ''resonance tubes'' used in Finnish voice training practice. An electroglottographic and acoustic investigation on the effects of this method on the voice quality of subjects with normal voice. Scandinavian Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics. 1992;17(4):151-61.

15. Sampaio M, Oliveira G, Behlau M. Investigation of immediate effects of two semi-ocluded vocal tract exercises. Pro-Fono, revista de actualización científica. 2008; 20(4): 261-6.

16. Kumar B, Bhat J, Prasad N. Cepstral analysis of voice in persons withn vocal nodules. J Voice. 2009;24(6):651-3.

17. Kumar R, Bhat J, Fahim S, Raju R. Cepstral analysis of voice in unilateral adductor vocal fold palsy. J Voice. In press. 2010.

18. Lowell S, Colton Raymond, Kelley R, Hanhn Y. Spectral-and cepstral-based measures during continuous speech: Capasity to distinguish dysphonia and consistency within a speaker. J Voice. In press. 2010

19. Cecconello L. Farias P, Gurlekian J. Aplicación del Cepstrum en la clínica vocal. Revista de de la Federación de Sociedades de Otorrinolaringologia. 2008;15 (1):12-4.

20. Alonso J, Ferrer M, Leon J, Travieso C. Cuantificación de la voz para su evaluación clínica por medio del análisis acústico. IV Jornadas de Tecnologia del habla. Zaragoza; 8 al 10 de noviembre de 2006.

21. Baken R, Orlikoff R. Clinical measurement of speech and voice. United states of America: Thomson Delmar Learning; 2000.

22. Verdolini-Marskon K, Burke MK, Lesac A, Glaze L, Caldwell E. Preliminary study of two method of treatment for laryngeal nodules. J Voice. 1995;9(1):74-85.

23. Verdolini K, Druker D, Palmer P, et al. Laryngeal adduction in resonant voice. J Voice. 1998;12(3):315–27.

24. Titze I. Nonlinear source-filter coupling in phonation: Theory. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008; 123(5):2733-49.

25. Barrichelo-Lindström V, Behlau M. Perceptual Identification and Acoustic Measures of the Resonant Voice Based on "Lessac's Y-Buzz"—A Preliminary Study With Actors. J Voice. 2007;21(1):46-53.

26. Behlau M. Voz, o libro do especialista, Vol II. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 2005.

27. Barrichelo-Lindström V, Behlau M. Resonant voice in acting students: perceptual and acoustic correlates of the trained Y-Buzz by Lessac. J Voice. 2009; 23(5):603-9.


Submitted date:
18/01/2011

Accepted date:
06/04/2011

6a3888bba953954ad64192d6 cefac Articles
Links & Downloads

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections