Revista CEFAC
https://www.revistacefac.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/S1516-18462011005000031
Revista CEFAC
Review Articles

Instrumentos de avaliação breve da comunicação: ferramentas existentes e sua aplicabilidade clínica

Brief communication assessment instruments: available tools and their clinical applicability

Fabíola Schwengber Casarin; Karina Carlesso Pagliarin; Cristine Koehler; Camila Rosa de Oliveira; Rochele Paz Fonseca

Downloads: 0
Views: 218

Resumo

Tema: a avaliação breve da comunicação é um recurso útil aos profissionais da saúde, pois fornece informações que subsidiam tanto o diagnóstico funcional, quanto o planejamento e a execução de avaliações expandidas e de medidas de reabilitação a serem realizados em cada caso.

Objetivo: apresentar uma revisão sistemática acerca do uso de instrumentos padronizados de avaliação breve da comunicação e caracterizar as populações alvo descritas.

Conclusão: encontraram-se 18 artigos, com 10 instrumentos breves, sendo a população mais examinada a de pacientes pós-acidente vascular cerebral. Os componentes linguísticos prevalentes nas avaliações foram expressão, compreensão, leitura e escrita.

Palavras-chave

Avaliação; Linguagem; Comunicação

Abstract

Background: the brief assessment of communication is a useful resource to health professionals. It provides information on the functional diagnosis, planning and execution of expanded evaluations and rehabilitation programs to be undertaken in each case.

Purpose: to submit a systematic review on the use of standardized instruments regarding brief assessment of communication, and characterize the target population.

Conclusion: based on the conducted research, 18 manuscripts with 10 brief instruments were found. The most examined population was post-stroke patients. Expression, comprehension, reading and writing were the most prevalent linguistic components in the evaluations.

Keywords

Evaluation; Language; Communication

References

1. Haan EHF, Zandvoort MJE, Nys GMS, Kappelle LJ. Neuropsychological sequelae of cerebellar stroke. J Neurol Scien. 2009; 283: 269.

2. Dikmen SS, Corrigan JD, Levin HS, Machamer J, Stiers W, Weisskopf MG. Cognitive outcome following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009; 24: 430-8.

3. Mansur LL, Carthery MT, Caramelli P, Nitrini R. Linguagem e cognicao da doenca de Alzheimer. Psicol: Reflexao e Critica. 2005; 18(3): 300-7.

4. Helm-Estabrooks N. Aphasia Diagnostic Profiles (ADP). Dallas: PRO-ED; 1992.

5. Goodglass H, Kaplan E. Assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1972.

6. Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B. Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. 3th ed. Texas: The Psychological Corporation; 2000.

7. Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.

8. Benton L, Hamsher S, Sivan A. Multilingual Aphasia Examination (MAE-E). Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. Cambridge University Press; 1994.

9. Spreen O, Benton AL. Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia: Manual of instructions (NCCEA). Victoria: University of Victoria; 1977.

10. Porch B. Porch Index of Comunicative Ability (PICA). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1981.

11. Lapointe L, Horner J. Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia (RCBA-2). Dallas: PRO-ED; 1998.

12. De Renzi EY, Yignolo L. The token test: a sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain. 1962; 85: 665-78.

13. Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1982.

14. Ostrosky-Solis F, Ardila A, Rosselli M. NEUROPSI: A brief neuropsychological test battery in Spanish with norms by age and educational level. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1999; 5: 413-33.

15. Vitiello APP, Ciriaco JGM, Takahashi DY, Nitrini R, Caramelli P. Avaliacao cognitiva breve de pacientes atendidos em ambulatorio de neurologia geral. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2007; 65(2-A):299-303.

16. Reys BN, Bezerra AB, Vilela ALS, Keusen AL, Marinho V, Paula E, Laks J. Diagnostico de demencia, depressao e psicose em idosos por avaliacao cognitiva breve. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2006; 52: 401-4.

17. Fonseca RP, Salles JF, Parente MAMP. Instrumento de Avaliacao Neuropsicologica Breve NEUPSILIN. Sao Paulo: Vetor; 2009.

18. Yates DB, Trentini CM, Tosi SD, Correa SK, Poggere LC, Valli F. Apresentacao da Escala de Inteligencia Wechsler abreviada (WASI). Aval. Psicol. 2006; 5(2): 227-33.

19. Beato RG, Nitrini R, Formigoni AP, Caramelli P. Brazilian version of the frontal assessment battery (FAB): preliminary data on administration to healthy elderly. Dement & Neuropsychol. 2007; 1: 59-65.

20. Nelson HE. A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex. 1976; 12: 313-24.

21. Fonseca RP, Parente MAMP. Metanálise de estudos do processamento comunicativo em individuos com lesao vascular direita. Est Psico (Campinas). 2007; 24(4):529-38.

22. Brookshire RH. Introduction to neurogenic communication disorders. Missouri: Mosby; 2003.

23. Hilari K, Northcott S, Roy P, Marshall J, Wiggins RD, Chataway J, Ames D. Psychological distress after stroke and aphasia: the first six months. Clin Rehabil. 2010; 24:181-90.

24. Hilari K, Lamping DL, Smith SC, Northcott S, Lamb A, Marshall J. Psychometric properties of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) in a generic stroke population. Clini Rehabil. 2009; 23: 544-57.

25. Long A, Hesketh A, Bowen A. Communication outcome after stroke: a new measure of the carer's perspective. Clin Rehabil. 2009; 23: 846-56.

26. Casas R, Calamia M, Tranel D. A screening test of English naming ability in bilingual Spanish/English speakers. J Clinic Exp Neuropsychol. 2008; 30(8): 956-66.

27. Kostalova M, Bartkova E, Sajgali K, Dolenska A, Dusek L, Bednarik J. A standardization study of the Czech version of the Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test (MASTcz) in stroke patients and control subjects. Brain Injury. 2008; 22(10): 793-801.

28. Laska AC, Kahan T, Hellblom A, Murray V, von Arbin M. Design and methods of a randomized controlled trial on early speech and language therapy in patients with acute stroke and aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008; 15(3): 256-61.

29. Sabe L, Courtis MJ, Saavedra MM, Prodan V, Lujan-Calcagno M, Melian S. Desarrollo y validación de una batería corta de evaluación de la afasia: 'bedside de lenguaje'. Utilización en un centro de rehabilitación. Rev Neurol. 2008; 46(8):454-60.

30. Theodoros D, Hill A, Path BS, Russell T, Ward E, Wootton R. Assessing acquired language disorders in adults via the internet. Telemed e ehealth. 2008; 14(6): 552-9.

31. Edwards DF, Hahn MG, Baum CM, Perlmutter MS, Sheedy C, Dromerick AW. Screening patients with stroke for rehabilitation needs: validation of the post-stroke rehabilitation guidelines. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006; 20(1): 42-8.

32. Kalbe K, Reinhold N, Brand M, Markowitsch HJ, Kessler J. A new test battery to assess aphasic disturbances and associated cognitive dysfunctions - german normative data on the aphasia check list. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005; 27: 779-94.

33. Nakase-Thompson R, Manning E, Sherer M, Yablon SA, Gontkovsky SLT, Vickery C. Brief assessment of severe language impairments: Initial validation of the Mississippi aphasia screening test. Brain Injury. 2005; 19(9): 685-91.

34. Blake H, McKinney M, Treece K, Lee E, Lincoln NB. An evaluation of screening measures for cognitive impairment after stroke. Age Ageing. 2002; 31: 451-6.

35. Thommessen B, Thoresen GE, Bautz-Holter E, Laake K. Screening by nurses for aphasia in stroke - the Ullevaal Aphasia Screening (UAS) test. Disabil Rehabil. 1999; 21(3): 110-5.

36. Enderby P, Crow E. Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: validity and comparability. Disabil Rehabil. 1996; 18(5): 238-40.

37. Gibson L, MacLennan WJ, Gray C, Pentland B. Evaluation of a comprehensive assessment battery for stroke patients. Int J Rehabil Res. 1991; 14(2):93-100.

38. Mumby, K. Preliminary results from using the Panjabi adaptation of the Aphasia Screening Test. Br J Disord Commun. 1990; 25(2): 209-26.

39. O'Donnell JP, Romero JJ, Leicht D. A comparison of language deficits in learning-disabled, had-injured, and nondisabled young adults. J Clin Psychol. 1990; 46(3):310-5.

40. Enderby PM., Wood VA, Wade DT, Hewer RL. The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: A short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for nonspecialists. Inter J Rehabil Med. 1987; 8: 166-70.

41. Horton Jr. AM, Horton III AM. Brief and comprehensive neuropsychological assessment of alcohol and drug abuse. In D'Amato RC, Hartlage LC, editors. Essentials of neuropsychological assessment - treatment planning for rehabilitation. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2008. p. 293-314.

42. William JM. Brief and extended neuropsychological assessment of aging and dementia. In D'Amato RC, Hartlage LC, editors. Essentials of neuropsychological assessment - treatment planning for rehabilitation. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2008. p. 315-32.

43. Salter K, Jutai J, Foley N, Hellings C, Teasell R. Identification of aphasia post-stroke: A review of screening assessment tools. Brain Inj. 2006; 20(6): 559-68.

44. Berthier ML. Poststroke aphasia : epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment. Drugs Aging. 2005; 22(2): 163-82.

45. Dennis M. Language disorders in children with central nervous system injury. J Clin Exper Neuropsychol. 2010; 32(4): 417-32.

46. Pawlowski J, Fonseca RP, Salles JF, Parente MAMP, Bandeira DR. (2008). Evidencias de validade do Instrumento de Avaliacao Neuropsicologica Breve NEUPSILIN. Arq Brasil Psicol. 2003; 60: 101-16.


Submitted date:
09/30/2010

Accepted date:
02/07/2011

6a483fb1a953950f9f1a55e4 cefac Articles
Links & Downloads

Revista CEFAC

Share this page
Page Sections